Marc Cucurella photo appears in deleted X post that claimed Palmer and Joao Pedro injured

Screenshots of a deleted X post tied to Marc Cucurella circulated before Chelsea's match at Brighton, claiming Cole Palmer and Joao Pedro were both injured.

2 Min Read
1 Views
Liam Rosenior provides update on Cole Palmer and Joao Pedro | News | Official Site

Screenshots of a deleted post on X that included an image of the back of Marc Cucurella's curly hair circulated for hours before Tuesday's match at , claiming and would be missing from Chelsea's line-up.

The screenshots showed a post purporting to come from Cucurella's barber that read, "[Cole] Palmer and Joao Pedro both injured tonight," followed by, "There's your exclusive." When were asked about the item, the club did not deny the authenticity of the post. Cole Palmer and Joao Pedro were both absent from the Chelsea team that night.

The detail matters partly because of Cucurella's background: he joined Chelsea for £63m in 2022 from Brighton, making any image tied to him especially pointed when it appears the club's plans have been leaked ahead of a match at his former ground.

The timing deepened the impact. Chelsea were seventh in the Premier League table with four league matches left to play and were due to face Leeds in the FA Cup semi-final at on Sunday, leaving little margin for distraction as the season reached its closing weeks.

Context makes the circulation of the screenshots more than a social-media oddity. Cole Palmer had been carrying a hamstring problem but had not had any public injury update before the match. Joao Pedro, meanwhile, had undergone a fitness test on the morning of the game. Team news around both legs of Chelsea's Champions League tie with had also reportedly leaked earlier in the campaign.

Those earlier leaks, and Tuesday's screenshots, would together mark the third instance of reported team-news leakage since Liam Rosenior's appointment in early January. Rosenior has made a point of keeping selection tight—he holds pre-match news conferences two days in advance to try to keep opposing managers guessing—and has told reporters the previous leaks had been "dealt with" and had "not come from any place of malicious intent towards me or the team."

There is friction between the certainty of the line-up on the pitch and the uncertainty of where the information originated. The deleted post cannot be independently verified. A broadcaster contacted the barber and Cucurella's representatives for comment, and the post had been removed by the time screenshots began to circulate.

The leaks pose a practical problem for a manager trying to shield his preparations: if team lists or fitness news are routinely escaping before kick-off, opponents can plan around absences and the club loses control of the narrative around key selection and fitness decisions. Chelsea's failure to deny the post's authenticity when asked compounds the sense that internal controls are not airtight.

The single most consequential unanswered question is simple and urgent: if this is the third reported leak since Rosenior arrived in early January, where are the leaks coming from and what more must the club do ahead of a weekend semi-final to ensure team information stays inside the building?

TAGGED:
Share This Article